|
Chapter 9: Transportation
Streamline Vehicle Fleet
Registration
Summary
Business owners that own a fleet of vehicles—from a few to several
thousand vehicles—currently register each of these vehicles individually.
Other states send companies a consolidated registration notice and allow
companies to register their fleets in fewer transactions. The Texas Department
of Transportation should streamline the fleet registration process to allow for
consolidated registration of vehicle fleets.
Background
In Texas, a single procedure is used to register all vehicles. Once a year,
TxDOT mails a renewal notice for each vehicle to the owner. The owner can mail
in the notice with payment of appropriate state and local fees to the
county assessor-collector, or the owner can renew the registration in
person. The owner then receives a windshield sticker to place on the vehicle, a
license plate in lieu of a sticker, or
both.[1]
Vehicle fleets in Texas range from a handful to several thousand cars,
trucks, and trailers. Fleet owners must follow the same process for each
vehicle, regardless of the fleet size. For example, a business with a 20-vehicle
fleet based within a single county would receive 20 renewal notices in the mail.
The owner then must mail in or take to the county offices 20 notices and pay the
county assessor-collector. Most county assessor-collectors will accept one check
from the owner for all of the vehicles that are being registered. If the company
operates in multiple counties, the renewal notices are sent to its office in
each county unless the company requests that TxDOT mail the notices to a central
location. Regardless of where the notice is received, however, vehicle
registration renewals must be paid to the county where the vehicle is
headquartered. For example, a business operating a 20-vehicle fleet in three
different counties may receive its notices at one location, but must return the
notices and payments to three different county assessor-collector offices. Since
the local fees vary by county, identical vehicles in different locations may be
assessed different registration fees. The business owner must ensure that the
proper forms and payments are made to each of the three county
assessor-collectors.[2]
Discussions with a major rental car company and a heating/air conditioning
company made it clear that processing separate registrations for each vehicle is
time consuming. Fortunately for these two companies, the majority of their
vehicles were registered in the same county. One company built a spreadsheet to
manage the payment process and to keep track of registrations. Both companies
indicated they would prefer to have a listing of all their vehicles that are to
be registered rather then a form for each
vehicle.[3]
Drawbacks of the Current System
Although the lack of a “fleet identifier” in the automated
Registration and Titling System (RTS) precludes an accurate count of vehicle
fleets in Texas, TxDOT estimates about 300,000 such vehicles in the state. TxDOT
spends about $0.31 to print and mail each renewal notice, or about $92,200 for
300,000 vehicles.[4] Fleet managers spend a large
amount of time handling vehicle registration renewals. Managing a large fleet
located in multiple counties, with significant amounts of paper work and filing,
is a costly operation for the owner.
As the renewal notices are received by the county assessor-collector, each
vehicle is processed as a separate transaction. Even though the forms include
bar codes that decrease the transaction processing time, this process can still
be lengthy. The Harris County Assessor-Collector officially asked TxDOT to
implement a fleet registration program to improve service to Harris County
customers.[5]
Other States
A few other states allow fleet vehicles to be registered as a group using a
single identifying number and payment for all vehicles operated by a single
owner. Arizona Motor Vehicle Carrier Division, for example, sends one
registration to each fleet owner, listing all vehicles for which registration is
due. The owner can mark through those vehicles that are no longer in the fleet
and add new vehicles to the list. The owner mails the renewal list and one
payment for the total registration fee. Arizona also provides this fleet
registration online through the Internet.[6]
North Carolina Motor Vehicle Division is conducting a pilot test with seven
fleet companies using Internet registration. North Carolina’s plan is to
implement Internet renewal registrations first. Trucking companies will access
the registration data files through the Internet using their identification
codes and company name. Viewing the vehicle listing online, companies can accept
the fleet as is or add and delete vehicles. The system will accept payment by
credit card or electronic funds transfer.[7]
Modifying the Texas Process
A fleet registration process in Texas would require several significant
changes. RTS would need to be modified to identify vehicles as part of a fleet
and to generate a consolidated renewal notice. The county assessor-collectors
and/or TxDOT would need to work with fleet managers to identify fleet vehicles
and properly code them in RTS. A method for adding and deleting vehicles from
the fleet, both when a fleet vehicle is bought or sold and when registration
renewals are processed would be needed. TxDOT would mail consolidated
registration renewal notices, which would require a different form and,
depending upon the size of the fleet, may cost more to mail than one of the
current notices.[8]
TxDOT estimates that the one-time modification of RTS to allow fleet
registrations would cost almost $309,000.[9]
Without accurate information on the number of currently registered vehicles that
are part of a fleet, or the average size of Texas fleets, the savings in
printing and mailing costs cannot be fully estimated. The savings, however,
would continue each year.
Recommendation
State law should be amended to allow for
consolidated registration renewal of vehicle fleets.
Texas Department of Transportation (TxDOT) should modify the Registration and
Titling System (RTS) to identify fleet vehicles and produce a combined listing
of the fleet vehicles that are registered by each fleet operator. Operators
would receive a single listing of all their vehicles to be registered, rather
than one notice per vehicle, providing a cost savings to TxDOT and improving
customer service.
Fiscal Impact
TxDOT would incur a one-time cost of about $309,000 to modify the
Registration and Titling System (RTS). Since RTS is in the process of an
upgrade, this enhancement is not expected to be included in the system until
fiscal 2003. The costs would be paid from the additional dollar fee, collected
in certain counties, dedicated to RTS enhancements. This estimated savings
represent the amounts of State Highway Fund revenue that could be redirected to
other TxDOT programs or budget items.
TxDOT would realize savings from reducing its printing and mailing of renewal
notices. TxDOT’s cost for printing and mailing each renewal notice is
about $0.31. Assuming 300,000 fleet vehicles with 100 vehicles per fleet, the
savings to TxDOT would be $91,000 each year. The total savings to counties from
processing fewer transactions could not be
estimated.[10]
Fiscal Year
|
Savings/(Cost) to RTS RestrictedAmounts in the State Highway
Fund
|
Net Savings to theState Highway Fund Available To
Redirect
|
2002
|
$0
|
$0
|
2003
|
($309,000)
|
$0
|
2004
|
$0
|
$91,000
|
2005
|
$0
|
$91,000
|
2006
|
$0
|
$91,000
|
[1 ]Letter from Charles W.
Heald, P.E., executive director, Texas Department of Transportation, to
Clint Winters, Research and Policy Development, Texas Comptroller of Public
Accounts, September 25, 2000; telephone interview with Joey Connell, analyst,
Operations Branch, Headquarters Operations, Vehicle Titles and Registration
Division, Texas Department of Transportation, Austin, Texas, August 15,
2000.
[2 ]Telephone interview with
Duane Pufpaff, chief, Headquarters Operations, Vehicle Titles and Registration,
Texas Department of Transportation, Austin, Texas, August 14, 2000; interview
with Darryl Hunt, deputy director, Steve Elsner, chief, Administrative
Operations; Danny Garza, assistant director, Field Operations; Bob Tanner,
director, Technical Operations, and Duane Pufpaff, chief, Headquarters
Operations, Vehicle Titles and Registration Division, Texas Department of
Transportation, Austin, Texas, March 28, 2000; Texas Department of
Transportation, Counties Imposing County Road and Bridge Add-On Fee,
Austin, Texas, January 1, 2000.
[3 ]Telephone interview with
Bill Morris, administrator for Tag and Title, Enterprise Rental Car
Administration Office, Austin, Texas, June 5, 2000; and telephone interview with
Sam Trogdon, office administrator, Osgood Heating and Air Conditioning,
Austin, Texas, June 5, 2000.
[4 ]Fiscal Impact Statement on
Fleet Registration, by Duane Pufpaff, chief, Headquarters Operations, Texas
Department of Transportation, Austin, Texas, August 14, 2000.
[5 ]Telephone interview with
Harry Morgan, director, Field Operations, Vehicle Titles and Registration
Division, Texas Department of Transportation, Austin, Texas, August 9,
2000.
[6 ]Telephone interview with
Jamie Robertson, fleet supervisor, Arizona Motor Vehicle Carrier Division,
Arizona Department of Transportation, Phoenix, Arizona, August 31,
2000.
[7 ]Telephone interview with
Mac Davenport, fleet manager, North Carolina Motor Vehicle Division, North
Carolina Department of Transportation, Raleigh, North Carolina, September 21,
2000.
[8 ]Telephone interview with
Harry Morgan, director, Field Operations, Vehicle Titles and Registration
Division, Texas Department of Transportation, Austin, Texas, August 9,
2000.
[9 ]Fiscal Impact Statement on
Fleet Registration by Duane Pufpaff, chief, Headquarters Operations, Vehicle
Titles and Registration Division, Texas Department of Transportation, Austin,
Texas, August 14, 2000.
[10 ]Telephone interview with
Steve Watt, county tax assessor-collector, Lubbock, Texas, July 14, 2000.
|