|
Chapter 9: Transportation
Allow TxDOT to Issue “e-liens”
Instead of Paper Titles
Summary
When a vehicle is purchased through a loan, the Texas Department of
Transportation (TxDOT) issues and mails the original paper title to the lender
or lien holder and a duplicate, non-negotiable paper title to the vehicle owner
as required by state law. Technology can now be used to issue the title to the
lien holder electronically, called e-lien, and is used by several other states.
Texas could save state revenue and reduce the cost to lien holders if TxDOT
could issue e-liens.
Background
When an individual purchases a vehicle with borrowed funds, state law
requires TxDOT to mail an original, negotiable title to the lien holder and a
duplicate original, non-negotiable title to the
owner.[1] Typically, the lien holder is a
financial institution.
When a vehicle is purchased using a loan, the lien holder submits an
application of title form with other supporting documentation and a $13 fee to
the county assessor-collector. The county assessor-collector enters the
information into the automated Registration and Titling System (RTS) and
issues a receipt to the owner. The county assessor-collector submits the
paperwork to TxDOT along with $8 of the fee, retaining the remaining $5. TxDOT
verifies that the fee was received, processes the paperwork, deposits $5 into
the General Revenue Fund and $3 into the State Highway Fund, and releases the
title for printing. RTS automatically prints an original title that is sent to
the lien holder and a duplicate original, non-negotiable title that is sent to
the owner. TxDOT uses a vendor to mail the titles to the appropriate
institutions and individuals. TxDOT issues about 2.6 million titles each year to
lien holders.[2] The cost to print and mail each
title is about $0.36, about $936,000 annually.[3]
Once the owner pays off the loan, the lien holder signs the original title,
indicating the loan has been paid, and gives the owner the title. Depending upon
the lien holder, the owner may pick up the title in person or may receive it in
the mail. The owner now has a negotiable title that can be used as proof of
ownership or to transfer the vehicle to a new owner when it is sold. However,
since neither the county assessor-collector nor TxDOT was included in this
transaction, the RTS record still shows a lien on the vehicle. To receive a
clean, lien-free title, the owner must request a new title through the county
assessor-collector. The owner presents an application of title form and the
signed title to the county assessor-collector and pays a $13 fee. The process
that was used to issue the title to the lien holder is repeated, but this time
the title is issued directly to the owner. TxDOT estimates that only about two
percent of vehicle owners complete this process; the remaining 98 percent keep
the signed title and use it when they sell the
vehicle.[4]
If the original title is lost, the lien holder or the owner must obtain a
duplicate negotiable title called a certified copy of original (CCO), by
submitting an application form and a fee to TxDOT. The CCO will continue to show
the lien on the vehicle. The lien holder can sign the CCO, as it would an
original title, or use a release of lien form. If the lien holder loses the
title and applies for the CCO, this process is fairly simple. If the owner loses
the signed, original title; however, the process can be more difficult because
the owner must contact the lien holder. Mergers and spin-offs of financial
institutions can make it difficult for the owner to find the original
lender.[5]
Moving to an electronic transaction
Current technology would allow TxDOT to process these title transactions
electronically by issuing electronic titles, or e-liens, to lien holders. The
county assessor-collector would receive the paperwork and fees, and would enter
the transaction into RTS. Instead of issuing a paper title to the lien holder,
however, TxDOT would notify financial institutions electronically that the title
transaction has been processed and that the institution has been identified in
RTS as the lien holder of record. Once the owner pays off his or her loan, the
institution would notify TxDOT electronically to release the lien. TxDOT would
update the RTS records to remove the lien and issue a clear title to the owner.
E-Lien Programs Outside Texas
At least seven states have implemented, or are in the process of
implementing, e-lien programs: California, Florida, Idaho, Massachusetts,
Pennsylvania, Virginia and Washington.[6] In
addition, the American Association of Motor Vehicle Administrators (AAMVA)
offers a program to help states set up e-lien
programs.[7] The review team contacted
California, Florida, Idaho and Pennsylvania, states with a range of experience
with e-liens.
Of the states contacted, none had tracked the specific costs of implementing
their e-lien programs, nor had they tracked savings associated with the
programs. “Improving customer service” was the most frequently cited
reason for creating e-lien programs. In addition, benefits cited also included
time savings, simpler processing, and reduced errors.
The California Department of Motor Vehicles Department (DMV)
began its program in 1989 and currently issues about 3.1
million titles with liens electronically, about 30 percent of the
total. Under the program, any authorized lending institution can receive an
e-lien. Once the e-lien loan is paid, the lien holder electronically submits the
information to transfer the ownership of the vehicle. Within eight days, DMV
will mail an original title to the owner. Vehicles that are not financed through
the e-lien program must go to the DMV to clear the title and pay a $15 fee. The
California DMV estimates that approximately 66 percent of the e-lien holders
either transfer title to another financial institution or trade the vehicle
before paying off the loan.[8]
Florida’s Department of Highway Safety is pilot testing its e-lien
system. It issues about 5.2 million titles and 110,000 duplicate titles each
year. The department expects the e-lien system to:
- create a public and private technological
partnership;
- lower costs for both the public and private
sectors;
- enhance customer service;
- reduce duplicate titles issued; and,
- improve accuracy of
information.[9]
The Idaho Transportation Department started their e-lien program in 1996. On
average, the Idaho Transportation Department issues 3,000 e-lien titles per
month, about eight percent of lien titles issued. The number of
e-liens issued increased 33 percent from calendar
1998 to 1999. The department indicated that savings come more from
faster processing and fewer errors than from lower cost. The department has
realized labor and other cost savings associated with issuing fewer duplicate
titles, condensing filing space, increasing information accuracy and reducing
the number of employees needed by the lien
holders.[10]
The Pennsylvania Bureau of Motor Vehicles implemented e-liens in 1998.
As of September 2000, the bureau had issued 98,000 e-lien titles, or about 2
percent of the total. The bureau considers the e-lien process to be a major step
in providing better customer service, with benefits very similar to those
mentioned by Idaho.[11] The bureau charges the
same fees to issue a title with a lien on paper or electronically.
Advantages of E-Lien
The e-lien process has several advantages for lien holders and for TxDOT. The
lien holders accepting e-liens would no longer have to process, file and store
paper titles. Since the title would be electronic, the lien holder could not
lose it and would never have to incur the cost of obtaining a CCO. TxDOT would
reduce the number of printed titles and certified copies, avoiding the costs of
paper, printing, and mailing.[12]
Recommendation
State law should be amended to allow TxDOT to issue
electronic titles to lien holders.
The Transportation Code should be changed to remove the requirements for
issuing and mailing paper titles. The Transportation Code should also be changed
to authorize the issuance and release of liens electronically, and to authorize
TxDOT to develop the rules necessary for lien holders to receive and release
liens electronically.
TxDOT should make the necessary programming changes to RTS to accommodate
e-liens. Financial institutions and other types of organizations that finance
vehicle loans should be notified of the opportunity to participate in the new
process. TxDOT should develop, publicize and distribute procedures for using the
e-lien process to counties and lending institutions.
Fiscal Impact
TxDOT would incur about $58,000 in cost to modify RTS to implement an e-lien
system.[13] The costs would be paid from the
additional dollar fee, collected on vehicles registered in certain counties,
dedicated to RTS enhancements. Since RTS is in the process of an upgrade, this
enhancement is not expected to be included in the system until fiscal 2003.
Assuming that 25 percent of titles would be issued electronically beginning in
fiscal 2004, TxDOT would delay printing and mailing about 650,000 titles at a
cost savings of $234,000. The number of e-liens issued and associated savings is
estimated to increase five percent each year. This savings would continue
through fiscal 2007. This estimated savings represents the amounts of State
Highway Fund revenue that could be redirected to other TxDOT programs or budget
items.[14]
Assuming that the initial e-liens were for four-year loans, TxDOT would print
and issue titles to the owners beginning in fiscal 2008. TxDOT estimates that
about half of the vehicle owners sell their vehicle before the loan is paid off;
therefore, TxDOT would only issue 325,000 titles to owners at a cost of $117,000
each year. In addition, the two percent of the owners who previously requested a
lien-free title will receive a lien-free title without paying the $13 fee,
resulting in a revenue loss for the state and counties. The loss is estimated to
total $32,500 to the General Revenue Fund, $32,500 to counties, and $19,500 to
the State Highway Fund per year beginning in fiscal
2008.[15]
Fiscal Year
|
Savings /(Cost) to RTS RestrictedAmounts in the State
Highway Fund
|
Net Savings to theState Highway FundAvailable to
Redirect
|
2002
|
$0
|
$0
|
2003
|
($58,000)
|
$0
|
2004
|
$0
|
$234,000
|
2005
|
$0
|
$246,000
|
2006
|
$0
|
$258,000
|
[1] V.T.C.A., Transportation
Code §501.027.
[2] Telephone interview with
Becky Beck, chief, Titles, Vehicle Titles and Registration Division, Texas
Department of Transportation, Austin, Texas, June 27, 2000, interview with Sue
Mainzer, branch manager, Title Control Systems, Vehicle Titles and Registration
Division, Texas Department of Transportation, Austin, Texas, June 15, 2000; and
memorandum from Jerry Dike, director, Vehicle Titles and Registration Division,
Texas Department of Transportation, to Richard Mudge, BBP Consultant Study.
[3] E-mail from Duane Pufpaff,
chief, Headquarters Operations, Vehicle Titles and Registration Division, Texas
Department of Transportation, August 8, 2000.
[4] Telephone interview with
Becky Beck, chief, Titles, Vehicle Titles and Registration Division, Texas
Department of Transportation, Austin, Texas, June 27, 2000.
[5] Telephone interview with
Becky Beck, chief, Titles, Vehicle Titles and Registration Division, Texas
Department of Transportation, Austin, Texas, June 27, 2000, telephone interview
with Harry Morgan, director, Field Operations, Vehicle Titles and
Registration Division, Texas Department of Transportation, Austin, Texas,
November 28, 2000.
[6] Texas Transportation
Institute, Electronic Lien and Titling Research Report 3913-S (College
Station, Texas, October 1997), pp. 27-28.
[7] Association of America
Motor Vehicle Administrators “Electronic Liens”
(www.aamva.org/aamvanet/Vehicle/elt.htm). (Internet document.)
[8] Telephone interview with
Diane Mobley, E-lien administrator, California Department of Motor Vehicles,
Sacramento, California, September 5, 2000.
[9] Telephone interview with
Gary Elmore, E-lien administrator, Florida Department of Highway Safety,
Tallahassee, Florida, June 27, 2000, telephone interview with Gary Elmore,
E-lien administrator, Florida Department of Highway Safety, Tallahassee,
Florida, November 28, 2000.
[10] Telephone interview with
Ed Pemble, E-lien administrator, Idaho Department of Transportation, Boise,
Idaho, July 11, 2000.
[11] Telephone interview with
Ann Maria Kessler, E-lien administrator, Pennsylvania Bureau of Motor Vehicles,
Harrisburg, Pennsylvania, July 11, 2000; telephone interview with Ann Maria
Kessler, E-lien administrator, Pennsylvania Bureau of Motor Vehicles,
Harrisburg, Pennsylvania, November 28, 2000.
[12] Texas Transportation
Institute, Electronic Lien and Titling Research Report 3913-S (College
Station, Texas, October 1997).
[13] Memorandum from Jerry
Dike, director, Vehicle Titles and Registration Division, Texas Department of
Transportation, to Richard Mudge, BBP Consultant Study, April 17, 2000.
[14] Memorandum from Jerry
Dike, director, Vehicle Titles and Registration Division, Texas Department of
Transportation, to Richard Mudge, BBP Consultant Study, April 17,
2000.
[15] Memorandum from Jerry
Dike, director, Vehicle Titles and Registration Division, Texas Department of
Transportation, to Richard Mudge, BBP Consultant Study, April 17,
2000.
|